Wednesday 21 August 2013

The Who: Who's Next

Who’s Next

Best song: Won’t Get Fooled Again

Worst song: maybe Getting In Tune

Overall grade: 6

(Here's one I wrote waiting for my operation this morning - which went really well, by the way, although I'm incredibly tired now.)

After the success of ‘Tommy’, Pete Townshend started to wonder how he could improve on the heights reached with that album. And so the Lifehouse project was created, something that has gone down in infamy as one of the most spectacular failures in music history, something that nearly destroyed the band and Townshend himself.
Now, nobody except Townshend completely understands the concept, but in essence it was to be a nightly live performance, fifty percent rock opera and fifty percent a kind of science experiment on the audience, who would be involved in creating the music. Before the concert each night, a bunch of information would be collected about everyone there, and then as the concert drew to a close, all the information would be computerised and somehow each person’s information would be turned into a single musical note. These notes, when played at exactly the same time, would allegedly create a ‘universal chord’ which would be some kind of spiritual experience for the audience. And as if trying to achieve this wasn’t enough, Lifehouse was also to be a double album and a film, which is the part that’s always confused me. If the universal chord was generated by the audience each night, how would they decide which version to use in the album/film? Surely it couldn’t be the same kind of experience if the listener wasn’t directly involved?
But anyway. Pete Townshend became completely overwhelmed by the scale of what he’d taken on and eventually almost suffered a nervous breakdown, causing him to shelve the project, although he has sporadically returned to it over the years and still dreams of making it a reality. Eight songs were selected from the original plans for Lifehouse and Entwhistle wrote a ninth, and these were recorded to make a simple, straightforward, no-frills rock album. Gone is the story and the overarching themes from the original plans, and instead the band are able to focus completely on the music, with often outstanding results.
Not their best album by any means but tighter than anything they’d put out before or since, Who’s Next is bookended by its two best songs, ‘Baba O’Riley’  and ‘Won’t Get Fooled Again’, both synthesizer-dominated in a time when synths were just entering widespread use. The truth is that I watched CSI: Miami and CSI: NY before I heard either of these, but I don’t think that influences how I feel about them, because I like the original CSI much better. I’ll take the full versions over the fifteen second remixes any day – ‘Baba O’Riley’ is the kind of song that packs so many different ideas into a relatively short time, which is fitting considering the original is 30 minutes long (now there’s a bonus track I’d like to see.) I guess this was one of the first arena rock songs, with its loud screams of ‘yeah!’, pulsing guitars, and loud and fast rhythm section, and of course it’s still one of the absolute best. For a mixture of the Who’s early protopunk sound and their later bombastic, operatic sound, it doesn’t get better than this.
But the other tracks aren’t half bad either. There’s nothing superfluous here – the fact that this is a single album sorted that out just fine, and we’re left with the good stuff, like the rocker ‘Bargain’ that really makes the most of Daltrey’s excellent voice, and the quiet, understated synths that create the mood in ‘The Song is Over’. I have no idea where most of these tunes would fit into the concept, and I’m fine with it staying that way.
‘Love Ain’t For Keeping’ is a short, country influenced track fill of childlike innocence. As a contrast to some of the more jaded songs, I think it could have been extended some more, since it interests me to hear Townshend messing around with these bluesier styles and it’s disappointing he didn’t have the confidence to make it a full song. Better than this is Entwhistle’s ‘My Wife’, featuring his trademark black humour and allowing him to play most of the instruments, including the piano and the horns. He always comes up with the goods at least once per album.
Side two is weaker but only slightly so, opening with ‘Getting in Tune’, which has excellent lyrics but the music lacks passion, seeming sometimes like it was written on autopilot. I prefer ‘Going Mobile’: more lighthearted than the rest of the material, giving an opportunity for Townshend to rock out on his guitar and use it to create some pretty unique effects. ‘Behind Blue Eyes’ has been a little overplayed over the years, but the melancholy verses and louder, more intense choruses are a traditional recipe for a dynamic song that’s always effective.
I also think this might be my favourite cover art on a Who album. Definitely looks like a teenage wasteland to me.

So what if Lifehouse had become a reality? In 1971 everyone was just waiting for the next musical innovation. Is it possible that the idea would have become the new gold standard, and everyone would be working to include audience involvement in their music? Or would it have been something like the Flaming Lips’ ‘Zaireeka’, an interesting curiosity but a one-off? I don’t know, but I hope Townshend finishes the project someday. Something that has informed so many of his albums both with the Who and solo, deserves to be seen through to completion.

2 comments:

  1. "I don’t know, but I hope Townshend finishes the project someday."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifehouse_Chronicles

    The story behind this release was "In 1998, Townshend's dream of bringing Lifehouse to a wide audience finally came true, when BBC Radio approached him with the idea of developing a radio play based on Lifehouse and incorporating the original music written for the project. The play, just under two hours in length, was transmitted on BBC Radio 3 on 5 December 1999."

    So this album contained what they played on the radio that day for the Lifehouse project.

    Ok essentially they are Pete Townshend solo versions of this song. I admit I had trouble listening to this (especially songs that already existed in The Who form) as Pete Townshend minus the rest of the band just doesn't sound right.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For me, my affection for Next boils down to three key elements. Two are musical, one is spiritual:

    1) POWER CHORDS. Next to Black Sabbath's first three albums, no record expounded more powerfully the effect of monolithic block chords and heavy riffage than this one. The playing on Baba O'Riley and Won't Get Fooled Again demonstrate this emphatically. The guitar rings like a beacon call to the world: I'M TAKIN ALL YOU M***** F****ERS ON! YOU BETTER GET OUT MY DAMN WAY! (Or something less vulgar, but we're talking Angry Drunken Pete, not Sensitive Baba Lover Pete)

    2) KEYBOARDS. No artist before (outside of psycho-organist like Manzarek, Emerson, Lord, et al) showed the Power that keys can have in driving a full-force rock band, specifically the piano. True there were geniuses like Elton out there that could rock and play emotional stuff, but there's this spirit of defiant vulnerability (if that makes sense) that permeates Pete's playing that is so moving. A lot of people get down on Song is Over and Gettin in Tune because of the pianos and "wimpiness" but the mood is anything but wimpy. And then there are the synths. Little did we know the horror and suffering that those little metal boxes would inflict on music in the years to come, but back then, they were new and different and actually could be used for good. And Pete doesn't just use 'em for keys. That wacky solo on Goin Mobile is a Mooger Fooger (I think), aka an envelope follower, and Moog still makes 'em. For years, I was mystified as to how he came up with that incredibly brilliant-yet-simple sequence on Baba O (aka "I Am"). I thought he played a synth module regular speed and then cranked the tempo either by speeding up the tape or increasing the rate on the sequencer. Turns out it was an organ with a funky rhythm feature patched into a synth. I don't anybody has done that before or since. But for a few bright years, synths were cool.

    3) GOOD LORD. The spiritual aspect of Next is really the grab for me. It's not just in the epic feel of the music. Pete is searching, and I believe he desperately wants to find some kind of transcendence or redemption in these songs. It's more than just The Perfect Note; He looks inside himself and doesn't like what he sees. If we're honest, we've all been there at some point. In Blue Eyes he's the reluctant villain, who uses violence to protect himself from pain, but in the end he still cries out for Someone to bite back his heart in his anger, to crack open his fist and purge the evil from his spirit. In Song is Over he the lonely, left-out loser who missed the party and is all alone with nothing but The Sky to cry out to. Gettin in Tune: he wants to find the straight and narrow path to peace and harmony. And Bargain is where he forsakes his earthly treasures for heavenly ones. These things were not what rock bands sang about in 1970-71. They speak to much deeper, more timeless truths than "Squeeze My Lemon" and "Everybody must get stoned."

    It's really a religious experience for me, and Pete Townshend is about the last guy I would go to for spiritual guidance. I'm a Christian who tries to be faithful, but most of the time I fall on my proverbial ass. Would I be brave enough to let Jesus stick His finger down my throat, metaphorically speaking? Would I drown an unsung man, or lose everything to find Him? One can only hope in Someone Bigger.

    Sorry for this RIDICULOUSLY LONG post, but this is like my second or third favorite albums EVER. Thanks for renewing my faith in the next generation's taste in music. There's hope for us yet.

    ReplyDelete